 |
(M.Codispoti)
Clockwise: Sally Regenhard, Thomas
D. Shanahan, Anthony A. LoPresti,
Hon. Alan J. Gerson. |
 |
(M.Codispoti)
Clockwise: Monica Gabrielle, Thomas
D. Shanahan, Anthony A. LoPresti,
Sally Regenhard, Hon. Allan J.
Gerson. |
 |
|
|
|
June 2003
Skyscraper Safety
Campaign, Inc., et al. v. Port Authority of
New York & New Jersey, et al
Text by SARA KUGLER
Associated Press Writer
June 2, 2003, 6:36 PM EDT
NEW YORK -- Families of Sept. 11 victims said they will argue
this week that city building and fire codes should be required
for new construction on the World Trade Center site, which
is owned by an interstate agency immune from the local regulations.
A group of victims' relatives
and politicians said Monday during a news conference
at ground zero that they expected to meet Thursday
with officials directing the redevelopment, including
representatives from the Port Authority of New York
and New Jersey, the owner.
"We have a simple
request, and that is: No building in this city should
be above the law," said Sally Regenhard, mother
of a fallen firefighter and founder of the Skyscraper
Safety Campaign.
The group contends that
the Port Authority's immunity from city codes was
established in connection to its role as an interstate
agency operating bridges, tunnels and ports and should
not apply when it acts as a "commercial landlord," as
in the case of the trade center.
The Port Authority maintains
it voluntarily adhered to city codes in constructing
the first trade center and intends to continue that
policy with the rebuilding on the site. The new plan
chosen in February by the Port Authority and the
Lower Manhattan Development Corp., the agency formed
after Sept. 11, 2001, to oversee the rebuilding of
the trade center's neighborhood, includes a 1,776-foot-high
tower and several smaller surrounding buildings.
The agencies confirmed
the planned meeting with the Skyscraper Safety Campaign
and said in a joint statement that they are "committed
to ensuring the rebuilding effort upholds both excellence
of design and high safety standards."
Federal investigators studying the collapse of the twin towers
are examining whether some parts of the construction were
not up to code, as the Port Authority claimed, but Regenhard
said the group's focus Monday was "not so much to look
back, but to look forward."
She and her attorney,
Tom Shanahan, added that they plan to file a lawsuit
in state Supreme Court late this week or next week
if they are not satisfied after meeting with the
LMDC and the Port Authority.
Shanahan's co-counsel, Anthony LoPresti, said that the Port
Authority has been "left to self-monitor itself" and
that agreements established in the 1990s to allow city fire
department inspections of the structures are "self-serving
and inadequate."
The suit would ask a judge
to agree with the plaintiffs that the Port Authority's
immunity from local codes does not apply when it
manages a property like the 16-acre trade center
site, located in the middle of bustling lower Manhattan.
The suit also asks for the same declaration at other properties
run by the Port Authority, including the city's two airports
and the bus terminal on Manhattan's west side.
Copyright © 2003,
The Associated Press. N.Y.
Newsday
|